Slauter v. Whitelock

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that if no motion was made by either party with respect to the receipt of unsworn 10 testimony then “it would amount to an acquiescence in the reception of his statements as evidence in the case”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• United States v. Armour & Co.
  N.D. Illinois· 1906-03-21· cited 40×
• Sweet v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1986-10-14· cited 35×
• State v. Paolella
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-06-27· cited 15×
• Leach v. Ackerman
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1891-06-23· cited 9×
• Langford v. United States
  Court Of Appeals Of Indian Territory· 1903-09-23· cited 8×
• State v. Lugar
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1901-12-21· cited 6×
• State v. Morrow
  Washington Supreme Court· 1911-04-27· cited 5×
• Cogswell v. Hoguet
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1891-06-02· cited 1×

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Peters v. Whitney
  New York Supreme Court· 1856-09-01· cited 10×