Slauson Partnership v. Ochoa

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[NJothing in the statute or case law suggests that the factual analysis for ruling on the motion must be frozen in time on the date the complaint is filed.”
• stating “our analysis starts with the fact that because the Mall is private property, Slauson did have the right to exclude persons from entering the Mall, and persons who entered the property without its permission were trespassing.”
• upholding stipulated injunction restricting behavior of protestors of strip club

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).