Slaubaugh v. Slaubaugh

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the valuation of non-economic damages “rests largely within the sound discretion of the jury”
• noting testimony that county had been specifically advised to place warning signs at dangerous intersection
• noting testimony that county had been specifically advised to place warning signs at dangerous intersection
• “Blomquist and Hagen suggest that we apply a stricter standard when allegations of prejudice are made against a judge who will try the case without a jury upon retrial.”
• on retrial after remand, “it will again be for the trial court to exercise its discretion in determining the relevancy and admissibility” 2 In United States v. Tham, 960 F.2d 1391, 1397 n.3 (9th Cir. 1991

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).