Ninth Circuit· 5/6/2008

Slatkin v. Neilson

Citations

525 F.3d 805
76 Fed. R. Serv. 495
2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 9694
49 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 267
2008 WL 1946739

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

explaining that because “direct proof of fraudulent intent is rarely available[,] . . . courts allow a find- ing of fraudulent intent based on circumstantial evidence”
examining federal securities law and stating that the operative term, “effecting,” means to bring about or make happen
finding a plea agreement fell within the 27 residual hearsay exception as it was evidence of a material fact, was uniquely probative of intent, and admission of the evidence furthered the general purposes of the Federal Rules of Evidence and the 28 interests of justice.
“[A] summary judgment proceeding does not deprive the losing party of its Seventh Amendment right to a jury trial.”
“[A] summary judgment proceeding does not deprive the losing party of its Seventh Amendment right to a jury trial.”
“[A] summary judgment proceeding does not deprive the losing party of its Seventh Amendment right to a jury trial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Beezer, Nelson, Silverman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

48 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.