Slatkin v. Neilson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that because “direct proof of fraudulent intent is rarely available[,] . . . courts allow a find- ing of fraudulent intent based on circumstantial evidence”
• examining federal securities law and stating that the operative term, “effecting,” means to bring about or make happen
• finding a plea agreement fell within the 27 residual hearsay exception as it was evidence of a material fact, was uniquely probative of intent, and admission of the evidence furthered the general purposes of the Federal Rules of Evidence and the 28 interests of justice.
• “[A] summary judgment proceeding does not deprive the losing party of its Seventh Amendment right to a jury trial.”
• “[A] summary judgment proceeding does not deprive the losing party of its Seventh Amendment right to a jury trial.”
• “[A] summary judgment proceeding does not deprive the losing party of its Seventh Amendment right to a jury trial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).