Skip to main content
· 2/1/1915

Slater v. Lich

Citations

  • 83 Wash. 687
  • 145 P. 996
  • 1915 Wash. LEXIS 744

Syllabus

<p>Appeal — Review—Harmless Error — Pleadings. Where, in an action to foreclose a mechanics’ lien, the action was fully tried out on the principal issues as to whether plaintiff had performed his contract and what sums were due on the contract price and for extras, and defendants claimed damages, the defendants were not prejudiced by the sustaining of a demurrer to their defense that a clause in the contract required the delivery of receipts for all labor and material, where the clause was ambiguous and it was not shown that any sums unpaid by the contractor were lienable claims against the property.</p>

Judges: Crow

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.