Slater v. Hatfield

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the Act did not create a private right of action and refusing to read such a right of action into the statute
• stating “courts have commonly declined to read private causes of action into provisions of Dodd-Frank that do not explicitly provide for them”
• stating “courts have commonly declined to read private causes of action into provisions of Dodd-Frank that do not explicitly provide for them”
• “(C]ourts have commonly declined to read private causes of action into provisions of Dodd- Frank that do not explicitly provide for them.”
• no private cause of action under Dodd-Frank for unfair, deceptive, or abusive acts or practices
• “The Court is not aware of any language of Dodd–Frank explicitly providing for a private cause of action for unfair, deceptive, or abusive acts or practices.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).