Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2/16/1906
Slater v. Advance Thresher Co.
Citations
- 97 Minn. 305
- 107 N.W. 133
- 1906 Minn. LEXIS 694
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- construing phrase “in the course of his employment” as “while engaged in the service of the master” or “during the time when the servant is engaged in the performance of the master’s work”
- construing phrase \in the course of his employment\ as \while engaged in the service of the master\ or \during the time when the servant is engaged in the performance of the master's work\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brown
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
44 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Birch v. AbercrombieWashington Supreme Court· 1913-07-29· cited 167×
- Fielder v. DavisonSupreme Court of Georgia· 1913-02-12· cited 107×
- Anderson v. Southern Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of Florida· 1917-02-23· cited 84×
- Daily v. MaxwellMissouri Court of Appeals· 1911-01-02· cited 72×
- Doran v. ThomsenSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1908-11-16· cited 70×
- Arkin v. PageIllinois Supreme Court· 1919-04-15· cited 69×
- Hartley v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court· 1911-03-13· cited 52×
- Jones v. HogeWashington Supreme Court· 1907-11-25· cited 48×
- Greeson v. BaileySupreme Court of Georgia· 1929-01-16· cited 44×
- Curry v. BickleySupreme Court of Iowa· 1923-11-13· cited 43×
- Tyler v. Stephan's AdministratrixCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 1915-03-26· cited 36×
- Kneff v. SanfordWashington Supreme Court· 1911-06-09· cited 34×
- Hockemeyer v. PoolerSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1964-07-24· cited 33×
- Penticost v. MasseySupreme Court of Alabama· 1917-11-15· cited 32×
- Sina v. CarlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1913-01-17· cited 29×
- Johnson v. EvansSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1919-01-10· cited 26×
- Provo v. ConradSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1915-07-16· cited 25×
- Gomez v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1934-01-22· cited 24×
- Hunter v. First State Bank of MorriltonSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1930-05-26· cited 22×
- Hays v. HoganMissouri Court of Appeals· 1914-04-28· cited 21×
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Mattson v. Minnesota & North Wisconsin RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1905-07-21· cited 81×
- Clancy v. BarkerEighth Circuit· 1904-05-28· cited 36×
- Mulvehill v. BatesSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1884-01-07· cited 30×
- Sheridan v. CharlickNew York Court of Common Pleas· 1872-12-15· cited 20×
- Stewart v. BaruchAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1905-04-20· cited 20×
- Campbell v. Northern Pacific R.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1892-12-05· cited 6×
- Buffalo Loan, Trust & Safe Deposit Co. v. CarstensenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1905-07-15· cited 3×
- Mouso v. A. N. Kellogg Newspaper Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1894-07-26· cited 3×
- Fish v. CoolidgeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1900-01-15· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.