Slanina v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• FBI’s “exhaustive search” of defendant’s “office computer equipment,” following “partial[]” search by defendant’s employer that did not implicate Fourth Amendment, held not to violate Fourth Amendment “even though the FBI may have looked at more files” than the employer had
• “Once [the private individual] looked at the computer and zip disk, [the defendant’s] expectation of privacy in them had already been eroded. He could not then complain about the FBI search of the same materials even though the FBI may have looked at more files”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).