Supreme Court of Alabama· 12/22/2017
Slamen v. Slamen
Citations
- 254 So. 3d 188
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- treating an appeal as a petition for a writ of mandamus \[f]or expedience\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Stuart
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Ex Parte Alfab, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama· 1991-08-23· cited 266×
- Ex Parte Ocwen Federal Bank, FSBSupreme Court of Alabama· 2003-08-29· cited 160×
- Home Ins. Co. v. RiceSupreme Court of Alabama· 1991-08-02· cited 61×
- State v. CobbSupreme Court of Alabama· 1972-06-29· cited 50×
- Ex Parte Jim Burke Automotive, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama· 2000-08-04· cited 29×
- FL CRANE & SONS v. Malouf Constr. Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama· 2006-09-01· cited 20×
- Frost v. DangerfieldSupreme Court of Alabama· 2010-05-14· cited 19×
- Managed Health Care Admin., Inc. v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Ala.Supreme Court of Alabama· 2017-09-01· cited 9×
- Slamen v. SlamenSupreme Court of Alabama· 2017-09-22· cited 6×
- Woodruff v. Gazebo East ApartmentsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 2015-05-15· cited 5×
- FMR Corp. v. HowardSupreme Court of Alabama· 2017-01-13· cited 5×
- Newman v. Kenworth of Birmingham, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama· 2000-12-29· cited 5×
- Cook v. Locklear Chrysler Jeep Dodge, LLC (Ex parte Locklear Chrysler Jeep Dodge, LLC)Supreme Court of Alabama· 2017-09-29· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.