Slali v. Ruiz (In Re Slali)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “if Ruiz cannot proceed against the debtors before the WCAB, he will have no remedy for whatever work- related injuries he has suffered.”
• “It is well established that [§ 524(e)] permits a creditor to bring or continue an action directly against the debtor to establish the debtor’s liability when establishing that liability is a prerequisite to recovery from another entity.”
• “[E]ven if it is not necessary to reopen the case[] and modify the discharge injunction[ ], it would still be prudent to do so[, as] ... the modification would serve as a clarification and avoid a conflict between [the courts] regarding the scope of the discharge injunction.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).