Skip to main content
· 4/8/2022

Slaieh v. Super. Ct.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • defendant’s claim that victims of childhood incest have flashbacks of prior rapes was not supported by record
  • not within expert’s special experience to testify whether sexual intercourse was consensual or forced
  • attempts to elicit inadmissible evidence on cross-examination properly curtailed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.