Slagle v. ITT Hartford Insurance Group

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that substantive, contradictory changes are permissible provided that deposition is “reopened to give the defendants the opportunity to impeach [the deponent] with his contradictory answers”
• stating that the original and corrected answers may be admitted into evidence and reopening the deposition to allow the deponent to be impeached with his contradictory answers

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).