Skip to main content

Slack v. State

Citations

  • 593 S.E.2d 664
  • 265 Ga. App. 306
  • 2004 Fulton County D. Rep. 251
  • 2004 Ga. App. LEXIS 1

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that “whether a particular act is ‘immoral or indecent,’ ” as those terms are used in the child molestation statute, OCGA § 16-6-4 (a), “is a jury question that may be determined in conjunction with the intent that drives the act”
  • “[W]hether a particular act is ‘immoral or indecent’ is a jury question that may be determined in conjunction with the intent that drives the act.”
  • “ ‘Objections not raised at trial cannot be raised for the first time on appeal.’ ”
  • consent is not a defense to child molestation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Eldridge, Ruffin, Adams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.