Skip to main content
· 4/1/1998

Slaby v. Fairbridge

Citations

  • 3 F. Supp. 2d 22
  • 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4827
  • 1998 WL 169249

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that a plaintiff cannot “independently assert[] a cause of action under the Ninth Amendment”
  • dismissing the pro se plaintiff’s sex discrimination claim where she submitted only vague 16 allegations of discrimination and “cited no constitutional or statutory law to support her claims”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Urbina

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.