Skip to main content
· 10/3/2017

Slabakis v. Schik

Citations

  • 2017 NY Slip Op 6884
  • 154 A.D.3d 407
  • 60 N.Y.S.3d 813

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that under Illinois law unjust enrichment is a “request for relief” that is “tied to the fate” of an independent cause of action
  • holding that under Illinois law unjust enrichment is a “request for relief” that is “tied to the fate” of an independent cause of action
  • holding under Illinois law, unjust enrichment is a “request for relief” that is “tied to the fate” of an independent cause of action
  • “The request for relief based on unjust enrichment ts tied to the fate of the claim under the Consumer Fraud Act.”
  • ICFA deceptive practices claims subject to Rule 9(b)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sweeny, Moskowitz, Kahn, Gesmer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.