· 10/3/2017
Slabakis v. Schik
Citations
- 2017 NY Slip Op 6884
- 154 A.D.3d 407
- 60 N.Y.S.3d 813
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that under Illinois law unjust enrichment is a “request for relief” that is “tied to the fate” of an independent cause of action
- holding that under Illinois law unjust enrichment is a “request for relief” that is “tied to the fate” of an independent cause of action
- holding under Illinois law, unjust enrichment is a “request for relief” that is “tied to the fate” of an independent cause of action
- “The request for relief based on unjust enrichment ts tied to the fate of the claim under the Consumer Fraud Act.”
- ICFA deceptive practices claims subject to Rule 9(b)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sweeny, Moskowitz, Kahn, Gesmer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.