Skyline Consulting v. Mortensen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the appellant had not shown a significant effect on the verdict when the challenged testimony was general in nature, cumulative to other evidence, corroborated by other evidence, and “only minimally relied on” at trial
• stating that “decisions about which witnesses to interview are typically matters of trial strategy that we will not review”
• “An error is harmless beyond a reasonable doubt if the jury’s verdict was surely unattributable to the error.”
• “When an error implicates a constitutional right, we will award a new trial unless the error is harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. An error is harmless beyond a reasonable doubt if the jury’s verdict was surely unattributable to the error.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).