Skurnowicz v. Lucci

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that an aggrieved party has the option of rescinding the real estate sales contract
• considering [the] plaintiffs’ request for expert fees, although denying after determination that expert’s plan failed'to lead to a solution and thus fees deemed unreasonable
• Affirming trial court’s awards of “‘actual damages” under the UTPCPL as measured by “the difference between the [plaintiffs’ home’s] actual value and the misrepresented value.”
• Affirming trial court’s awards of “actual damages” under the UTPCPL as measured by “the difference between the [plaintiffs’ home’s] actual value and the misrepresented value.”
• superseded by statute on other grounds in Milliken v. Jacono, 60 A.3d 133 (Pa. Super. 2012)
• superseded by statute on other grounds as recognized in Milliken v. Jacono, 60 A.3d 133 (Pa.Super. 2012)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).