Skrocki v. Caltabiano

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• highlighting the plaintiff's lack of authority \for the proposition that a person's alleged property interest in his employment can be 'seized' within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment\
• “Not surprisingly, plaintiff has cited no authority for the proposition that a person’s alleged property interest in his employment can be ‘seized’ within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment to deprive him of a constitutional right within the meaning of Section 1983.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).