Skrine v. Staiman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• to prove scienter, it is sufficient to show “reckless indifference to error,” a “pretense of exact knowledge,” or “the assertion of a false material fact ‘susceptible of accurate knowledge,’ but stated to be true on the personal knowledge of the representer”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Clearview Concrete Products Corp. v. S. Charles Gherardi, Inc.
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1982-08-30· cited 101×
• Burgundy Basin Inn, Ltd. v. Watkins Glen Grand Prix Corp.
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1976-02-13· cited 48×
• Buxton Manufacturing Co. v. Valiant Moving & Storage, Inc.
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1997-05-19· cited 25×
• Goldner v. Doknovitch
  Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York· 1976-09-24· cited 16×
• DePinto v. Rosenthal & Curry
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1997-03-24· cited 14×
• Morse v. Swank, Inc.
  S.D. New York· 1978-10-10· cited 13×
• Allen v. Westpoint-Pepperell, Inc.
  S.D. New York· 1997-02-11· cited 9×
• Ocean Rock Associates v. Cruz
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1978-12-29· cited 9×
• Allen v. WestPoint-Pepperell, Inc.
  S.D. New York· 1997-01-28· cited 7×

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Saklaris v. Evangelista
  New York Supreme Court· 1956-07-18· cited 3×

Other cases named Skrine v. Staiman

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• Skrine v. Staiman
  New York Court of Appeals· 1969-02-19· cited 8×
• Skrine v. Staiman
  New York Supreme Court· 1968-04-16· cited 1×