Skretvedt v. Dupont De Nemours

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• following Fotta and Parke to hold that an ERISA beneficiary could force disgorgement of profits earned on withheld benefits
• “We have consistently rejected such attempts to litigate on remand 4 issues that were not raised in a party’s prior appeal and that were not explicitly or implicitly remanded for further proceedings.”
• “[A]n issue is waived unless a party raises it in its opening brief[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).