Skoog v. County of Clackamas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, “[although it is a close question, we conclude that” sufficient evidence existed to support a finding of probable cause
• holding that, “[a]lthough it is a close ques- tion, we conclude that” sufficient evidence existed to support a finding of probable cause
• declining to extend Hartman to case of “ordinary” retaliation that did not involve complex questions of causation
• noting “that a plaintiff need not plead the absence of probable cause in order to state a claim for retaliation”
• allowing plaintiffs to bring First Amendment retaliation claims even when probable cause existed for arrest
• “In this case, we define the right as the right of an individual to be free of police action motivated by retaliatory animus but for which there was probable cause.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).