Skolnick v. Pucetti

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that allegations that Defendant, a university, retaliated against Plaintiff by encouraging her husband to take a teaching position elsewhere served to “amplify” her claim of retaliation
• finding that allegations that Defendant, a university, retaliated against Plaintiff by encouraging her husband to take a teaching position elsewhere served to “amplify” her claim of retaliation
• allowing a husband’s claim—that the university employing a couple engaged in retaliatory conduct towards the husband in retaliation for his wife’s filing of an EEOC sex- discrimination charge—to proceed as a “wrongful retaliatory conduct” claim
• “The eleventh amendment does not ... bar suits for equitable relief against state officers in their official capacity_”
• “The purpose of the filing requirement is to [e]nsure that the settlement of grievances be first attempted through the office of the EEOC.”
• “The purpose of the filing requirement is to insure that the settlement of grievances be first attempted through the office of the EEOC.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).