Skip to main content
· 7/8/1963

Skipper v. Royal Crown Bottling Co.

Citations

  • 56 Del. 179
  • 6 Storey 179
  • 192 A.2d 910
  • 1963 Del. LEXIS 149

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding the relevant considerations under the statute are whether a structure is within 200 yards of a dwelling and appurtenant thereto and noting whether the structure is separated from the dwelling is immaterial
  • stating the undisputed fact that a fowl house was separated from a dwelling by a public roadway does not necessarily show that it was not appurtenant to a dwelling
  • stating whether a structure is appurtenant is a question of fact
  • stating the undisputed fact that a fowl house was separated from a public roadway does not show that it was not appurtenant, as the only question is whether the structure is within the requisite distance and appurtenant thereto, the separation by a roadway is immaterial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wolcott

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.