Skinner v. D'Cunha

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Article III justiciability requirements were satisfied despite the expiration of the named plaintiff’s claim for injunctive relief
• determining that the expiration of the plaintiff's claim one month after filing the lawsuit did not moot the class's claim for injunctive relief because \the district court could not have been expected to rule on a motion for class certification in that period\
• noting general rule that “once federal subject matter jurisdiction is established over the 7 underlying case between plaintiff and defendant, the jurisdictional propriety of each additional 8 claim is to be assessed individually” (brackets omitted
• “We consider whether the elements of Article III standing . . . were satisfied at the time the complaint was filed.”
• the MSP Act “forbids Medicare payments when a primary plan…is reasonably expected to make payment for the same medical care”
• \We consider whether the elements of Article III standing ... were satisfied at the time the complaint was filed.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).