Skilcraft Sheetmetal, Inc. v. Kentucky MacHinery, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating the KCPA “plainly contemplates an action by a purchaser against his immediate seller”
• considering whether a private cause of action is available through KRS 446.070
• “The Consumer Protection Act is remedial legislation intended to give consumers broad protection from illegal acts.”
• “The legislature intended that privity of contract exist between the parties in a suit alleging a violation of the Consumer Protection Act. “
• “The legislature intended that privity of contract exist between the parties in a suit alleging a violation of the [Kentucky] Consumer Protection Act.”
• “The legislature intended that privity of contract exist between the parties in a suit alleging a violation of the [Kentucky] Consumer Protection Act.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).