Skil Corporation v. Rockwell International Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• listing elements a plaintiff was required to allege “in order to state a claim upon which relief may be granted under Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act” including that “defendant made false statements of fact about its own product”
• “Perhaps this lack of consistency is best explained as being evidence óf the fact that the judiciary has yet to reach the limits of the coverage of the Act.”
• “Congress undoubtedly recognized and intended to remedy the destructive effect that Erie v. Tompkins had upon the development of a uniform federal common law of unfair competition which was essential in a nation where interstate commerce was dominant.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).