Skip to main content
· 4/4/2006

Skidmore v. Gateway Western Railway Co.

Citations

  • 366 Ill. App. 3d 238
  • 304 Ill. Dec. 401
  • 852 N.E.2d 857
  • 2006 Ill. App. LEXIS 267

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that all witnesses lived in the Missouri county where the accident took place
  • forum non conveniens is appropriate where the forum has no ability by the use of “compulsory process to secure the attendance of unwilling witnesses”
  • Illinois had no interest in being burdened by litigation concerning an automobile accident that occurred in Missouri and involved Missouri residents just because the defendant’s home office was in Illinois
  • Illinois had no interest in being burdened by litigation concerning an automobile accident that occurred in Missouri and involved Missouri residents just because the defendant’s home office was in Illinois
  • the private-interest factors favored Missouri because all of the witnesses were located there: “Illinois has no subpoena power over Missouri residents and, thus, has no ability to secure the attendance of unwilling residents who reside in Missouri”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Spomer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.