Skidmore v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “a judge’s statement that sanctions could be awarded is not grounds for recusal”
• holding that plaintiff’s allegations that the state administrative charges against him were based on defendant’s false statements did not “serve as the factual predicate for a plausible finding of bad faith”
• holding that plaintiff’s allegations that the state administrative charges against him were based on defendant’s false statements did not “serve as the factual predicate for a plausible finding of bad faith”
• holding that plaintiff’s allegations that the state administrative charges against him were based on defendant’s false statements did not “serve as the factual predicate for a plausible finding of bad faith”
• holding that plaintiff’s allegations that the state administrative charges against him were based on defendant’s false statements did not “serve as the factual predicate for a plausible finding of bad faith”
• holding that the plaintiff’s allegations that the criminal charges pending against him were based “on the false statements” of the defendant did not “serve as the factual predicate for a plausible finding of bad faith”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).