Skip to main content
· 4/12/2005

Skiba v. Gould (In Re Gould)

Citations

  • 322 B.R. 741
  • 35 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1765
  • 2005 Bankr. LEXIS 593
  • 95 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1850
  • 2005 WL 839918

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • asserting that the Supreme Court’s reference in Patterson to “a plan or trust” evinced “the Court’s understanding of the intent of Congress expressed both in ERISA and the Bankruptcy Code.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Warren W. Bentz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.