· 4/12/2005
Skiba v. Gould (In Re Gould)
Citations
- 322 B.R. 741
- 35 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1765
- 2005 Bankr. LEXIS 593
- 95 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1850
- 2005 WL 839918
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- asserting that the Supreme Court’s reference in Patterson to “a plan or trust” evinced “the Court’s understanding of the intent of Congress expressed both in ERISA and the Bankruptcy Code.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Warren W. Bentz
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.