Skf Usa, Inc. v. International Trade Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “We hence conclude that ... material differences that preclude infringement by gray goods may be physical or nonphysical.”
• “The determination [ ] by the Commission that ... all or substantially all of the goods were not [the materially different foreign version is a] finding [ ] of fact, subject to substantial evidence deference by this court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).