Skehan v. Board of Trustees of Bloomsburg State College

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that defendant was not in custody, in part, because officers did not handcuff, threaten, or pressure defendant
• holding that statute authorizing customs officials to board vessels \must be interpreted in a manner consistent with limitations imposed by the Fourth Amend- ment\
• holding that relocation to a police car for questioning due to inclement weather is a reason that mitigates against \whatever coercive elements are otherwise normally attendant [to a police car inquiry]\
• ”[U]nder 48(a) a count may be dismissed from an indictment without destroying the entire indictment or affecting the other charges contained therein.”
• court refused to adopt the position that the act of unloading constitutes participation in the conspiracy to distribute as opposed to merely completion of the conspiracy to import
• “[a]t most, an interest in the items found may be a factor considered when deciding whether there is a privacy interest in the area searched”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).