Skeffery v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the FDCPA “protect[s] an individual’s concrete interests” and thus “an alleged violation of these provisions satisfies the injury-in-fact requirement of Article III”
• holding that “a foreclosure action is an ‘attempt to collect a debt’ as defined by the FDCPA”
• holding that “statements must be materially false or misleading to be actionable under the FDCPA”
• holding that a foreclosure action is an “attempt to collect a debt” under the FDCPA
• holding that “statements must be materially false or misleading to be actionable” under § 1692e
• holding that “certificate of merit” and “request for judicial intervention” that were required by New York law to be filed with a foreclosure complaint were “formal pleadings” under 15 U.S.C. § 1693g(d

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).