Skeete v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• addressing facts similar to those at bar and applying the pre-Williams “reasonable person’s perspective” test to determine “[t]he date of arrest for speedy indictment purposes”
• noting “our existing speedy- indictment precedents do not require law enforcement to make an arrest based on every crime for which they possess probable cause”
• noting the officer did not make an explicit statement to the defendant that he was under arrest for interference
• an individual may be arrested for one offense without being arrested for every crime arising from the same event
• “Our cases have held that the speedy indictment rule is activated when a person is arrested for the commission of a public offense and does not extend to different offenses which have not resulted in arrest.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).