Skach v. Gee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• changes in the form of evidence for a debt do not release the security for that debt
• trust deeds that did not state correct principal amounts or maturity dates were valid against subsequent purchasers because they “knew what the cap was” and were therefore “on notice”
• trust deeds that did not state correct principal amounts or maturity dates were valid against subsequent purchasers because they “knew what the cap was” and were therefore “on notice”
• third-party purchaser could not avoid earlier mortgages when it had notice of the principal amount, interest rate, and term of the indebtedness, even where new notes had been substituted for those specifically described in the mortgages
• third-party purchaser could not avoid earlier mortgages when it had notice of the principal amount, interest rate, and term of the indebtedness, even where new notes had been substituted for those specifically described in the mortgages

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).