Sixty-Eight Devonshire, Inc. v. Shapiro

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \[I]n an opening it is not to be expected that a plaintiff will outline his damages with particularity. That is a matter ordinarily left to proof.\
• “[I]n an opening it is not to be expected that a plaintiff will outline his damages with particularity. That is a matter ordinarily left to proof.”
• damage to plaintiff’s building caused by recurring discharge of water from defective gutter on defendant’s building was continuing nuisance such that cause of action not barred by statute of limitations
• faulty gutter that dumped water on plaintiffs roof
• water repeatedly pouring onto plaintiffs properly from neighbor’s gutter
• continuedinvasion of property right defeats statute of limitations argument

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).