Six L'S Packing Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the holding of a judicial decision is to be read against the facts presented to the reviewing court
• holding decisions of the intermediate courts have no binding effect upon the Supreme Court
• stating that “the Legislature meant to require persons (including entities) contracting with others ... to assure that the employees of those others are covered by workers’ compensation insurance, on pain of assuming secondary liability for benefits payment upon a default.”
• refusing to consider aspect of ruling of WCJ which was beyond the scope of the grant of allocatur
• stating that “the Legislature meant to require persons (including entities) contracting with others … to assure that the employees of those others are covered by workers’ compensation insurance, on pain of assuming secondary liability for benefits payment upon a default[]”
• stating that “the Legislature meant to require persons (including entities) contracting with others … to assure that the employees of those others are covered by workers’ compensation insurance, on pain of assuming secondary liability for benefits payment upon a default[]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).