Skip to main content
· 12/27/1989

Six-Bros. King Drive Supermarket, Inc. v. Department of Revenue

Citations

  • 549 N.E.2d 586
  • 192 Ill. App. 3d 976
  • 139 Ill. Dec. 860
  • 1989 Ill. App. LEXIS 1932

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[bjasic notions of fair play require that parties have an opportunity to cross-examine, explain or refute facts which form the basis for an administrative agency’s adjudication”
  • justice required continuance where “the refusal to continue the hearing meant that the taxpayer could not be represented either by its corporate officer or by an attorney of its choice.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McNAMARA

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.