Sivak v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Department of Corrections’ retention, pursuant to new departmental rules, of an inmate’s gym trunks, deck of playing cards, pair of sweat pants, and other miscellaneous items did not rise to constitutional dimensions and thus did not violate inmate’s due process rights

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Martin v. Spalding
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1998-12-15· cited 16×
• Freeman v. State, Department of Corrections
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1988-11-01· cited 9×
• Sivak v. State
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1997-11-17· cited 2×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Bell v. Wolfish
  Supreme Court· 1979-05-14· cited 11,438×
• Hudson v. Palmer
  Supreme Court· 1984-07-03· cited 8,014×
• Jones v. North Carolina Prisoners' Labor Union, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1977-06-23· cited 1,564×
• Balla v. Idaho State Board of Corrections
  D. Idaho· 1984-11-01· cited 40×
• Harry Northern v. Louis S. Nelson
  Ninth Circuit· 1971-09-22· cited 20×
• Fort Worth Neuropsychiatric Hospital, Inc. v. Bee Jay Corp.
  Texas Supreme Court· 1980-05-21· cited 15×
• Charles Pitts v. Captain L. T. Griffin and Sgt. Jerry Carter, Correctional Officers, Cummins Unit, Arkansas Department of Correction
  Eighth Circuit· 1975-05-16· cited 10×
• Fort Worth Neuropsychiatric Hospital, Inc. v. Bee Jay Corp.
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1979-10-18· cited 6×