Court of Appeals of Washington· 2/18/2003
Sitton v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.
Citations
- 63 P.3d 198
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- vacating a class-certification trial plan because its effect was to “eliminate causation as an element of plaintiffs’ bad faith and Consumer Protection Act [(ch. 19.86 RCW)] claims”
- vacating a class-certification trial plan because its effect was to \eliminate causation as an element of plaintiffs' bad faith and Consumer Protection Act [(chapter 19.86 RCW)] claims\
- “Bifurcation does not violate the Seventh Amendment unless the questions sought to be bifurcated are so interwoven that one cannot be submitted independently of the other without confusion and uncertainty.”
- “courts have a variety of procedural options to reduce the burden of resolving individual damage issues, including bifurcated trials, use of subclasses or masters, [or] pilot or test cases with selected class members”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ellington
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
19 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Jennifer S. v. Department of Child SafetyCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2016-08-09· cited 145×
- Moeller v. Farmers Ins. Co. of WashingtonWashington Supreme Court· 2011-12-22· cited 54×
- Nelson v. Appleway Chevrolet, Inc.Washington Supreme Court· 2007-04-26· cited 46×
- Schnall v. AT&T Wireless Services, Inc.Washington Supreme Court· 2011-04-14· cited 44×
- Kavu, Inc. v. Omnipak Corp.W.D. Washington· 2007-01-23· cited 39×
- Chavez v. Our Lady of Lourdes Hosp. at PascoWashington Supreme Court· 2018-04-19· cited 15×
- Moeller v. Farmers InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2010-03-16· cited 13×
- Moeller v. Farmers Ins. Co. of WashingtonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2010-03-16· cited 12×
- Renaldo White v. Symetra Assigned Benefits Service CompanyNinth Circuit· 2024-06-20· cited 12×
- John Doe G v. Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2017-01-23· cited 11×
- Admasu v. Port of SeattleCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2014-10-27· cited 11×
- Wright v. JeckleCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2004-05-13· cited 7×
- Moore v. Washington State Health Care AuthorityWashington Supreme Court· 2014-08-21· cited 7×
- McGinn v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court· 2004-11-19· cited 4×
- Schnall v. AT & T Wireless Services, Inc.Washington Supreme Court· 2010-02-09· cited 1×
- Moore v. Health Care Auth.Washington Supreme Court· 2014-08-21
- Comcast Cable Communication Mgmt v. State Of WashingtonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2021-03-08
- Maria Barnes, V. Sea Mar Community Health Centers, Et Ano.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2024-01-08
- Robert E. Thomas Trust, V. Johns Real Estate CorpCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2022-01-03
Cites
21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. ShuttsSupreme Court· 1985-06-26· cited 1,691×
- Dianne Castano v. The American Tobacco CompanyFifth Circuit· 1996-05-23· cited 871×
- Gasoline Products Co. v. Champlin Refining Co.Supreme Court· 1931-05-18· cited 659×
- Allison v. Citgo Petroleum Corp.Fifth Circuit· 1998-10-02· cited 578×
- Maximo HILAO, Class Plaintiffs, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ESTATE OF Ferdinand MARCOS, Defendant-AppellantNinth Circuit· 1996-12-17· cited 402×
- Esplin v. HirschiTenth Circuit· 1968-09-30· cited 393×
- Sofie v. Fibreboard Corp.Washington Supreme Court· 1989-09-27· cited 308×
- Safeco Insurance Co. of America v. ButlerWashington Supreme Court· 1992-02-06· cited 260×
- Lacey Nursing Center, Inc. v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court· 1995-11-02· cited 166×
- Coventry Associates v. Am. States Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1998-09-03· cited 138×
- Coventry Associates v. American States InsuranceWashington Supreme Court· 1998-09-03· cited 138×
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,925 Arthur Young & Company v. United States District Court, Etc., Albert Kaufman, Real Parties in InterestNinth Circuit· 1977-03-04· cited 119×
- Smith v. Behr Process Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2002-09-13· cited 95×
- Besel v. Viking InsuranceWashington Supreme Court· 2002-07-18· cited 88×
- Besel v. Viking Ins. Co. of WisconsinWashington Supreme Court· 2002-07-18· cited 82×
- Pickett v. Holland America Line-Westours, Inc.Washington Supreme Court· 2001-11-29· cited 47×
- Myers v. Boeing CompanyWashington Supreme Court· 1990-08-15· cited 43×
- Brown v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1971-12-30· cited 31×
- Dore v. KinnearWashington Supreme Court· 1971-10-14· cited 27×
- Molski v. GleichNinth Circuit· 2002-10-10· cited 13×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.