Site Microsurgical Systems, Inc. v. the Cooper Companies, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting argument that parent company of subsidiary patent holder had standing to sue for infringement, even though parent argued that it effectively controlled patent and had suffered lost sales of its product as a result of the infringement
• “Ultimate factual determinations ... are not for the court to decide in the context of a motion to dismiss.”
• “[T]he claim must be futile as a matter of law rather than merely unlikely as a matter of fact.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).