Sitarek v. Sitarek

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• under § 248 of New York’s Domestic Relations Laws, must show parties are holding themselves out as man and wife to establish cohabitation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Gordon v. Gordon
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1996-04-19· cited 29×
• Torgersen v. Torgersen
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1992-12-30· cited 18×
• Okvist v. Contro
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2005-09-30· cited 4×
• Smith v. Smith
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1996-11-27· cited 1×
• Sanseri v. Sanseri
  New York Supreme Court· 2015-04-06

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• DeCabrera v. Cabrera-Rosete
  New York Court of Appeals· 1987-12-15· cited 854×
• O'Brien v. O'Brien
  New York Court of Appeals· 1985-12-26· cited 434×
• Northrup v. Northrup
  New York Court of Appeals· 1978-02-14· cited 58×
• Bliss v. Bliss
  New York Court of Appeals· 1985-12-19· cited 58×
• Praeger v. Praeger
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1990-06-25· cited 46×
• Pintus v. Pintus
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1984-10-09· cited 32×
• Rados v. Rados
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1987-09-30· cited 20×
• Levy v. Levy
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1988-10-31· cited 9×