Skip to main content
· 10/15/1910

Sistrunk ex rel. Sistrunk v. Wilson

Citations

  • 98 Miss. 672
  • 54 So. 89

Syllabus

<p>Contract. Fraudulent omission. Parol evidence.</p> <p>The terms of a written contract may not be added to nor taken from by parol evidence, but such testimony is admissible to show that through fraud of the draftsman, the writing does not evidence the real contract.</p>

Judges: Anderson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.