Sisso v. Islamic Republic of Iran

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• presuming that defendant in default is not subject to jurisdiction in any state
• finding specific personal jurisdiction supported by allegations that, if proven, would demonstrate that indiscriminate terrorist attack in downtown Tel Aviv “was calculated to cause injury” to persons residing in United States
• “D.C. law does not permit an unincorporated association to sue or be sued directly.” (citations omitted)
• collecting cases and dismissing non-federal claims against Hamas

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).