Skip to main content
· 9/22/1970

Sisselman v. Smith

Citations

  • 432 F.2d 750
  • 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 7247

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that district court must clearly articulate reasons and factors prompting its decision to grant a 54(b) certification
  • stating that the factors are not all inclusive
  • “miscellaneous factors such as delay, economic and solvency considerations” may justify entry of judgment
  • \The variety and number of factors which may be present in any one case highlights the importance of the district court's evaluation and articulation of those factors leading to its grant of Rule 54(b) certification.\
  • \The variety and number of factors which may be present in any one case highlights the importance of the district court's evaluation and articulation of those factors leading to its grant of Rule 54(b) certification.\
  • “The variety and number of factors which may be present in any one ease highlights the importance of the district court’s evaluation and articulation of those factors leading to its grant of Rule 54(b) certification.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Aldisert, Gibbons, Winter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.