Sissel v. United States Department of Health and Human Services

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reading Flint to conclude that it is “sufficient,” but not necessary, “to comport with the Origination Clause when a Senate amendment to a House revenue bill is germane to the subject-matter of the bill”
• “Under the Supreme Court’s precedents — sparse as they may be on this subject — so long as the primary purpose of the provision is something other than raising revenue, the provision is not subject to the Origination Clause.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).