Skip to main content
· 11/22/1978

Sissel v. Smith

Citations

  • 250 S.E.2d 463
  • 242 Ga. 595
  • 1978 Ga. LEXIS 1292

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “whether ... restrictive covenant prevents the incidental use of a portion of a residence for business or trade purposes is a question of fact depending upon the facts and circumstances of a given case”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Marshall, Hill

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.