Sisemore v. Farmers Ins. Co. of Arizona

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[Punitive damages] is not a ‘claim’ that can be enforced separately from the 26 bad faith claim.”
• judgment rejecting plaintiffs’ request for punitive damages not appealable because such request “is not a separate claim for relief under Rule 54(b)”
• “The insertion of Rule 2 This appeal does not implicate the provisions of Rule 54(b) relating to multiple- party litigation. 5 54(b
• a punitive damages claim is not a separate claim that can be enforced from the underlying tort claim
• “The insertion of Rule 2 This appeal does not implicate the provisions of Rule 54(b) relating to multiple- party litigation. 5 54(b) language only acts to make an order or judgment final and immediately appealable if the judgment completely disposes of an entire claim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).