Siry Inv., L.P. v. Neman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a party waived any argument over improper closing statements when counsel failed to object
• noting that federal employment laws do not impose a flat ban on all harassment and only prohibit harassment based on a protected trait
• plaintiff subjected to four years of groping, mimed sex acts, and racial slurs; threatened with meat cleavers and had tires slashed after reporting workplace abuse to supervisor
• plaintiff was subjected to four years of groping, mimed sex acts, and racial slurs; he was threatened with meat cleavers and his tires were slashed after he reported workplace abuse to a supervisor
• party waived any argument over improper closing statements when counsel failed to object

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).