Sirois v. Stephens

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that multiple theories of breach of the same contract were not discrete and segregable as they were part of an “closely interwoven whole”
• holding, for purposes of Rule 54(b), that multiple theories of breach of the same contract did not constitute discrete or segregable claims; instead, they were part of a “closely interwoven whole”
• discussing meaning of a cognizable “claim” for purposes of Rule 54(b)
• “Under New York law, nominal damages may be awarded to a party who has shown breach of contract, even in the absence of evidence of a related loss.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).