Sirdah v. NORTH SPRINGS ASSOCIATES, LLLP

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that parties must support enumerations of error with argument and citations of authority, and mere conclusory statements are not the type of meaningful argument contemplated by this Court's rules
• “an appellant must support enumerations of error with argument and citations of authority, and mere conclusory statements are not the type of meaningful argument contemplated by Rule 25 (a) (3)
• \[M]ere conclusory statements are not the type of meaningful argument contemplated by [our rules].\
• “[M]ere conclusory statements are not the type of meaningful argument contemplated by [our rules].”
• where landlord expressly told abandoning tenant that it was not terminating leases, and proceeded to sue tenant for breach, landlord’s acceptance of key from tenant did not show intent to terminate
• unsworn allegations in an answer could not satisfy party’s burden of proof

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).